RESUMO
Current guidelines are mandatory in the choice of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and in patients with coronary artery disease and previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty that develop atrial fibrillation. However, in the real world there are crossroads with multiple choices, especially taking into account patient's peculiar characteristics and risk factors, which sometimes are not well represented in the guidelines. The reported clinical case focuses on the choice of anticoagulation therapy in a patient with chronic and severe coronary artery disease and new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation who, considering his specifically high coronary thrombotic risk, probably should continue antiplatelet therapy.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been increasing the conditions in which emergency physicians are forced to rapidly reverse anticoagulation in case of life-threatening bleeding or need of urgent surgery or invasive procedures. The recent approval of Idarucizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody fragment (Fab), offered the opportunity to rapidly and safely neutralize the anticoagulant effect of Dabigatran. However, real-world experience of its effective use in different emergency setting is now required. Lumbar Puncture (LP) is recognized as an invasive procedure at major bleeding risk and is, therefore, contraindicated in anticoagulated patients. CONCLUSION: We report a successful use of Idarucizumab in an emergency LP of a young woman with a possible diagnosis of encephalitis and a previous history of venous thromboembolism on long-term treatment with Dabigatran 150 mg twice a day.
